History and Impact of Gypsy Moth in North America and Comparison to Recent Outbreaks in Europe

Authors

  • Michael Mcmanus USDA Forest Service, Hamden, Connecticut, USA
  • György Csóka Department of Forest Protection, Hungarian Forest Research Institute, Mátrafüred, Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37045/aslh-2007-0004

Keywords:

Lymantria dispar L, outbreak frequency, spread, North America, Europe, gyapjaslepke, tömegszaporodások gyakorisága, terjeszkedés, Észak-Amerika, Európa

Abstract

The article summarizes information about the introduction, spread, population dynamics, and impacts of the gypsy moth in North America and elucidates comparisons with the importance of this forest pest in Europe. Additionally, the natural enemies (parasites, predators, and pathogens) that help regulate gypsy moth populations, are discussed at length. Gypsy moth outbreaks on both continents are associated with the presence, abundance and characteristics of oak forests. While oak forests in Europe are rather fragmented and their area has declined, oak forests in North America are both extensive and contiguous. Consequently there is an obvious disparity in the magnitude, impact, and synchrony of gypsy moth outbreaks in Europe and in North America. Even if the frequency and severity of outbreaks in Europe will increase in the future, the spread of outbreaks will be limited by the availability of suitable hosts and climatic factors. Conversely, gypsy moth will continue to spread to West and South in the United States and the area infested will increase significantly until it eventually occupies the natural distribution of oak species. Because of this prognosis, an emphasis has been placed on slowing the spread of the gypsy moth rather than treating defoliating populations.

References

BESS, H. A. – SPURR, S. H. – LITTLEFIELD, E. W. (1947): Forest site conditions and the gypsy moth. Harvard Forest Bulletin 22. 56 pp.

BOETTNER, G. H. – ELKINTON, J. S. – BOETTNER, C. J. (2000): Effects of a biological control introduction on three nontarget native species of Saturniid moths. Conservation Biology 14: 178-1806.

BOGENSCHUTZ, H. – MAIER, K. – TREBITZKY, C. (1989): Gypsy moth outbreaks in southwest Germany, 1984-1986. In: Wallner, W.E. – McManus, K.A. (tech. cords.) Proceedings, Lymantriidae: a comparison of features of New and Old World tussock moths. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report NE-123. 89-100.

BROWN, M. W. (1984): Literature review of Ooencyrtus kuvanae (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), an egg parasite of Lymantria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Entomophaga 29: 249-265.

CAMPBELL, R. W. – SLOAN, R. J. (1977): Forest stand response to defoliation by the gypsy moth. Forest Science Monograph 19. 34 pp.

CAMPBELL, R. W. – SLOAN, R. T. (1978): Numerical bimodality among North American gypsy moth populations. Environmental Entomology 7: 641-646.

COMMONWEALTH INSTITUTE OF ENTOMOLOGY (1981): Distribution maps of pests, Series A, Map No. 26 (Revised). Lymantria dispar (L.). CAB International, Wallerford, United Kingdom.

CSÓKA, GY. – HIRKA, A. (2007): A gyapjaslepke kártételt követő kárláncolatok ["Damage chains" following the gypsy moth damage]. In: Csóka, Gy. – Varga, Sz. (eds.) 2007: Gyapjaslepke (Gypsy moth), Agroinform, Budapest (in press) (Hungarian with English summary)

CSÓKA, GY. – HIRKA, A. (2007): A gyapjaslepke jelentősége [Importance of gypsy moth]. In: Csóka, Gy. – Varga, Sz. (eds.) (2007): Gyapjaslepke [Gypsy moth], Agroinform, Budapest (in press) (Hungarian with English summary)

CSÓKA, GY. – KOVÁCS, T. (1999): Xilofág rovarok – Xylophagous insects. Agroinform, Budapest, 1999. (Bilingual – Hungarian and English)

CSÓKA, GY. – TÓTH, J. – KOLTAY, A. (1999): Trends of sessile oak decline in North-Eastern Hungary. In: Forster, B. – Knizek, M. – Grodzki, W. (eds.): Methodology of Forest Insects Disease Survey in Central Europe. Proceedings of the Second Workshop of the IUFRO WP 7.03.10. 48-53.

DAVIDSON, C. B. – GOTTSCHALK, K. W. – JOHNSON, J. E. (1999): Tree mortality following defoliation by the European gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) in the United States. A review. Forest Science 45: 77-84.

ELKINTON, J. S., HEALY, W. M. – BUONACCORSI, J. P. – BOETTNER, G. H. – HAZZARD, A. – LIEBHOLD, A. M. – SMITH, H. R. (1996): Interactions among gypsy moth, white-footed mice, and acorns. Ecology 77:2332-2342.

ELKINTON, J. S. – HAJEK, A. – BOETTNER, G. – SIMONS, E. (1991): Distribution and apparent spread of Entomophaga maimaiga (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales) in gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) populations in North America. Environmental Entomology 20: 1601-1605.

FELT, E. P. (1942): The gypsy moth threat in the United States. Eastern Plant Board Circular No. 1.

FORBUSH, E. H., – FERNALD, C. H. (1896): The Gypsy Moth. Wright and Potter Printing Co., Boston, MA. 495 pp.

FUESTER, R. W. – RAMASESHIAH, G. (1989): A comparison of the parasite complexes attacking two closely related Lymantriids, pp. 501-556. In: Wallner, W. E. – McManus, K. A. (tech. cords.): Proceedings, Lymantriidae: a comparison of features of New and Old World tussock moths. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report NE-123. 554 pp.

FUHRER, E. (1998): Oak decline in Central Europe: a synopsis of hypotheses. In: McManus, M. L. – Liebhiold, A. M. (eds.): Proceedings, population dynamics, impacts, and integrated management of forest defoliating insects; 1996 August 18-23; Banska Stiavnica, Slovak Republic. U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report NE-247. 7-24.

GRIJPMA, P. (1989): Overview of research of Lymantriids in eastern and western Europe. In W. E. Wallner, W. E. – McManus, K. A. (tech. cords.): Proceedings, Lymantriidae: a comparison of features of New and Old World tussock moths. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report NE-123. 21-49.

GSCHWANTNER, T. – HOCH, G. – SCHOPF, A. (2002): Impact of predators on artificially augmented populations of Lymantria dispar L. pupae (Lep.: Lymantriidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 126: 66-73.

HAJEK, A. – HUMBER, R. – ELKINTON, J. – MAY, B. – WALSH, S. – SILVER, J. (1990): Allozyme and restriction fragment length polymorphism analyses confirm Entomophaga maimaiga responsible for 1989 epizootics in North American gypsy moth populations. Proceedings, National Academy of Sciences. USA. 87: 6979-6982

HIGASHIURA, Y. (1989): Survival of eggs in the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar. I. Predation by birds. Journal of Animal Ecology 58: 403-412.

HIRKA, A. 2005: A 2004. évi biotikus és abiotikus erdőgazdasági károk, valamint a 2005-ben várható károsítások [Biotic and abiotic damage in the Hungarian forests in 2004, and the damage forecast for 2005]. Hungarian Forest Research Institute, Budapest, pp. 126. (Hungarian with English summary)

HIRKA, A. 2006: A 2005. évi biotikus és abiotikus erdőgazdasági károk, valamint a 2006-ban várható károsítások [Biotic and abiotic damage in the Hungarian forests in 2005, and the damage forecast for 2006]. Hungarian Forest Research Institute, Budapest, pp. 124. (Hungarian with English summary)

HIRKA, A. 2007: A 2006. évi biotikus és abiotikus erdőgazdasági károk, valamint a 2007-ben várható károsítások [Biotic and abiotic damage in the Hungarian forests in 2006, and the damage forecast for 2007]. Hungarian Forest Research Institute, Budapest, pp. 128. (Hungarian with English summary)

HOCH, G. – GSCHWANTNER, T. – SCHOPF, A. (1999): The gypsy moth and its natural enemies at different population densities in the oak forests of eastern Austria. IOBC Bulletin 22: 121-128.

HOY, M. A. (1976): Establishment of gypsy moth parasitoids in North America: an evaluation of possible reasons for establishment or non-establishment. In: Anderson, J. F. – Kaya, H. K. (eds), Perspectives in Forest Entomology. Academic Press, New York. Chapter 15: 215-232.

JOHNSON, D. M. – LIEBHOLD, A. M. – BJORNSTAD, O. N. – MCMANUS, M. L. (2005): Circumpolar variation in periodicity and synchrony among gypsy moth populations. Journal of Animal Ecology 74: 882-892.

JONES, G. G. – OSTFELD, R. S. – RICHARD, M. P. – SCHAUBER, E. M. – WOLFF, J. O. (1998). Chain reactions linking acorns to gypsy moth outbreaks and Lyme disease risk. Science 279:1023-1026.

LEONARD, D. E. (1974): Recent developments in ecology and control of gypsy moth. Annual Review of Entomology 19: 192-229.

LESKÓ, K. – HIRKA, A. – CSÓKA, GY. 2007: A gyapjaslepke populációdinamikája Magyarországon [Population dynamics of gypsy moth in Hungary]. In: Csóka, Gy. – Varga, Sz. (eds.) 2007: Gyapjaslepke [Gypsy moth], Agroinform, Budapest (in press) (Hungarian with English summary)

LESKÓ, K. – SZENTKIRÁLYI, F. – KÁDÁR, F. 1994: Gyapjaslepke (Lymantria dispar L.) populációk fluktuációs mintázatai 1963-1993. közötti időszakban Magyarországon. [Fluctuation patterns of gypsy moth populations between 1963 and 1993 in Hungary]. Erdészeti Kutatások. 84. 163-176 (Hungarian with English summary)

LEUSCHNER, W. A. – YOUNG, J. A. – WALDON, S. A. – RAVILI, F. W. (1996): Potential benefits of slowing the gypsy moth’s spread. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 20: 65-73.

LIEBHOLD, A. – N. KAMATA, N. (2000): Are population cycles and spatial synchrony characteristic of forest insect populations? Population Ecology 42:205-209.

LIEBHOLD, A. M. – J. HALVERSON, J. – ELMES, F. (1992): Quantitative analysis of the rate of spread of gypsy moth in North America. Journal of Biogeography 19:513-520.

LIEBHOLD, A. M. – GOTTSCHALK, K. W. – LUZADER, E. R. – MASON, D. – BUSH, A. R. – TWARDUS, D. B. (1997): Gypsy moth in the United States: an atlas. U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report NE-233. 33 pp.

LIEBHOLD, A. M. – V. MASTRO, V. – SCHAEFER, P. W. (1989): Learning from the legacy of Leopold Trouvelot. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 35: 20-21.

LIEBHOLD, A. – ELKINTON, J. – WILLIAMS, D. – MUZIKA, R-M. (2000): What causes outbreaks of the gypsy moth in North America? Population Ecology 42:257-266.

LIPA, J. (1996): Present status of noxious Lymantriidae in Europe and Poland, pp 13-31. In: Proceedings, International Conference, Integrated management of forest Lymantriidae; 1996 March 27-29; Warsaw-Sekocin, Poland. Warsaw, Forest Research Institute.

MAROVIC, R. – MAROVIC, M. – JANCIC, G. – LAZAREV, V. (1998): Gypsy moth outbreaks in Serbia, pp. 1-6. In: The Gypsy Moth Outbreaks in Serbia. Acta entomologica Serbie (Special Issue). Belgrade, Serbia.

MAYO, J. H. – STRAKA, T. J. – LEONARD, D. S. (2003): The cost of slowing the spread of the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 96:1448-1454.

McFADDEN, M. W. – McMANUS, M. L. (1991): An insect out of control? The potential for spread and establishment of the gypsy moth in new forest areas in the United States. In: Baranchikov, Y.N. – Mattson, W.J. – Hain, F.P. – Payne, T.L. (eds.): Forest Insect Guild; patterns of interaction with host trees. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report NE-153. 172-184.

McMANUS, M. L. (1978): Expanded gypsy moth research and development program. Journal of Forestry 76: 144-149.

McNAMARA, D. G. (1996): EPPO’s perspective on the gypsy moth in Europe. In: Proceedings, 1995 Annual Gypsy Moth Review; 1995 November 5-8; Traverse City, MI. Michigan Department of Agriculture, Lansing. 60-65.

MIHAJLOVIC, L. J. – GRBIC, C. – D VANDIC D. (1998): The latest outbreaks of gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar L., in the region of Serbia in the period 1995-1998. In: The gypsy moth outbreaks in Serbia. Acta entomologica Serbie (Special Issue). Belgrade, Serbia. 80-88.

MILLER, D. R. – MO, T. K. – WALLNER, W. E. (1989): Influence of climate on gypsy moth defoliation in southern New England. Environmental Entomology 18:646-650.

MONTGOMERY, M. E. – WALLNER, W. E. (1988): The gypsy moth: a westward migrant. In: Berryman, A.E. (ed.): Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations. Plenum Publishing Corp. 353-373.

NEALIS, V. G. – QUEDNAU, F. W. (1996): Canadian field releases and overwinter survival of Ceranthia samarensis (Villeneuve) (Diptera: Tachinidae) for biological control of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Proceedings, Entomological Society of Ontario 127: 11-20.

NEALIS, V. G. – RODEN, P. M. – ORTIZ, D. A. (1999): Natural mortality of the gypsy moth along a gradient of infestation. Canadian Entomologist 131:507-519.

PERRY, C. C. (1955): Gypsy moth appraisal program and proposed plan to prevent spread of the moths. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Washington, D.C. Technical Bulletin No. 1124.

PILARSKA, D. – McMANUS, M. L. – P. PILARSKI, P. – GEORGIEV, G. – MIRCHEV, P. – LINDE, A. (2006): Monitoring the establishment and prevalence of the fungal entomopathogen Entomophaga maimaiga in two Lymantria dispar L. populations in Bulgaria. Journal of Pest Science 79: 63-67.

REARDON, R. (1991): Appalachian gypsy moth integrated pest management project. Forest Ecology and Management 39: 107-112.

REICHART, G. (1959): Birds destroying eggs of Lymantria dispar L. Aquila 77: 315-317.

ROTHSCHILD, G. 1958: Exterminatin by rodents of the gypsy moth in the area of mass reproduction. (Translated from Russian). Byull. Mosk. O-VA. Ispyt. Prir. Otd. Briol. 63: 129-130.

SHAROV, A. A. – LEONARD, D. S. – LIEBHOLD, A. M. – ROBERTS, E. A. – DICKERSON, E. A. (2002): Slow the Spread: a national program to contain the gypsy moth. Journal of Forestry 100: 30-35.

SIDOR, C. (1979): The role of insect pathogenic microorganisms in the protection of environment. Mikrobiologija 16: 173-186.

SMITH, H. R. (1985): Wildlife and the gypsy moth. Wildlife Society Bulletin 13: 166-174.

SMITH, H. R. – LAUTENSCHLAGER, R.A. (1978): Predators of the gypsy moth. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 534. 72 pp.

SMITH, H. – ELKINTON, J. – WALLNER, W. – LUNCHENKO, G. – BARANCHIKOV, Y. (1998): Comparison of the potential role of small mammal predators of forest pest insects in the U. S. and former Soviet Union: a study of ecological equivalents. In: Euro-American Mammal Congress, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. (abstract) 294-295.

SOPER, R, M. – SHIMAZU, M. – HUMBER, R. A. – RAMOS, M. E. – HAJEK, A. (1988): Isolation and characterization of Entomophaga maimaiga sp. nov., a fungal pathogen of gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar from Japan. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 51: 229-241.

STEIN, J. – BINION, D. – ACCIAVATTI R. (2003): Field guide to native oak species of eastern North America. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service FHTET-2003-01, 161 p.

TURCEK, R. J. (1950): The bird population in some deciduous forests during an outbreak. Bulletin of the Institute of Forest Research of the Czech Republic 3: 108-131.

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (1995): Gypsy moth management in the United States: a cooperative approach. Final environmental impact statement. Volumes 1-5. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

WEISER, J. (1987): Patterns over place and time. In: James R. Fuxa and Yoshinori Tanada, eds. Epizootiology of insect diseases. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 215-244.

WESELOH, R. – ANDREADIS, T. (1992): Mechanisms of transmission of the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) fungus Entomophaga maimaiga (Entomophthorales: Entomophthoraceae) and effects of site condition on its prevalence. Environmental Entomology 21: 901-906.

WESELOH, R. – BERNON, G. – BUTLER, L. – FUESTER, R. – MCCULLOUGH, F. STEHR, F. (1995): Releases of Calasoma sycophanta (Coleoptera: Carabidae) near the edge of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) distribution. Environmental Entomology 24: 1713-1717.

WILLIAMS, D. W. – LIEBHOLD, A. M. (1995): Influence of weather on the synchrony of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) outbreaks in New England. Environmental Entomology 24: 987-995.

WOODS, S. A. – ELKINTON, J. S. (1987): Bimodal patterns of mortality from nuclear polyhedrosis virus in gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) populations. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 50: 151-157.

ZELINSKAYA, L. M. (1980): Role of microsporidia in the abundance dynamics of the gypsy moth Porthetria dispar, in forest plantings along the lower Dnieper River (Ukrainian Republic, USSR). Vestn. Zool. 1: 57-62.

ZUBRIK, M. – J. NOVOTNY, J. (1996): The complex of gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) parasitoids in Slovakia and other Central European countries. In: S. L. C. Fosbroke and K. W. Gottschalk, eds. Proceeding, U. S. Department of Agriculture interagency research forum 1996; 1996 January 16-19; Annapolis, MD. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station General Technical Report NE-230. Radnor, PA. 83-88.

Michael MCMANUS – György CSÓKA: History and Impact of Gypsy Moth in North America and Comparison to Recent Outbreaks in Europe

Published

2007-01-01

How to Cite

Mcmanus, M., & Csóka, G. (2007). History and Impact of Gypsy Moth in North America and Comparison to Recent Outbreaks in Europe. Acta Silvatica & Lignaria Hungarica, 3(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.37045/aslh-2007-0004