The Multifunctional Role of Shelterbelts in Intensively Managed Agricultural Land – Silvoarable Agroforestry in Hungary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37045/aslh-2020-0002Keywords:
shelterbelt, productivity, green infrastructure, erdősáv, termelékenység, zöld infrastruktúraAbstract
The use of shelterbelts as windbreaks to protect and increase field productivity has a long history in Hungary. Nevertheless, when shelterbelts began to wane, many environmental problems such as soil drying, deflation, and erosion began to occur, which in turn led to economic difficulties. Earlier field experience supported by new results indicates that shelterbelts are beneficial for intensively-treated fields, this despite the space shelterbelts require. Our research study aims to summarize the information available in Hungarian and international literature regarding the most effective shelterbelt structure. In addition, the study supports the design of multipurpose tree plantations with recommendations to mitigate climate change impacts and minimize the negative effects of intensive agricultural technology. In this article we would like to draw attention to the fact that shelterbelts can serve as effective tools in agroforestry and can be regarded as a means of ensuring economically and environmentally sustainable methods for agriculture. Below, we summarize how shelterbelts can help with adaptation to coming global and local challenges; we also describe why and how shelterbelts can be renewed and implemented in a reasonable way.
References
ABDALLA, Y. Y. – FANGAMA, I. M. (2015): Effect of Shelterbelts on Crop Yield in Al-Rahad Agricultural Scheme, Sudan. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci 4(7): 1–4.
AKPOTI, K. – KABO-BAH, A. – ZWART, S. J. (2019): Agricultural land suitability analysis: State-of-theart and outlooks for integration of climate change analysis. Agricultural Systems 173: 172–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.02.013
AMADI, C. C. – FARRELL, R. E. – VAN REES, K. CJ. (2017): Greenhouse gas emissions along a shelterbelt-cropped field transect. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 241: 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.09.037
AMADI, C. C. – VAN REES, K. CJ. – FARRELL, R. E. (2016): Soil–atmosphere exchange of carbondioxide, methane and nitrousoxide in shelterbelts compared with adjacent cropped fields. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 223: 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.026
AMICHEV, B. Y. – BENTHAM, M. J. – KURZ, W. A. – LAROQUE, C. P. – KULSHRESHTHA, S. – PIWOWAR, J. M. – VAN REES, K. CJ. (2016): Carbon sequestration by white spruce shelterbelts in Saskatchewan, Canada: 3PG and CBM-CFS3 model simulations. Ecological Modelling 325: 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.01.003
AMICHEV, B. Y. – LAROQUE, C. P. – VAN REES, K. C. J. (2020): Shelterbelt removals in Saskatchewan, Canada: implications for long-term carbon sequestration. Agroforestry Systems (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00484-8
BARNA, T. (2004): Miért van szükség erdősávrendszerekre? [Why are shelterbelts necessary?] – Növényvédelmi tanácsok. XIII./2: 38–39. (in Hungarian)
BARÓTFI, I. (2000): Környezettechnika. [Environmental Techniques] Mezőgazda Kiadó, Bp. (in Hungarian)
BAUNDRY, J. (2000): Hedgerows: An international perspective on their origin, function and management. Journal of Environmental Management 60 (1): 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2000.0358
BOSKOVIC, J. – ZELJANA, P. – IVANC, A. (2010): Economical and ecological impact of shelterbelts. Economics of Agriculture 57 (2): 51–57.
BRANDLE J. R. – HINTZ D. L. – STURROCK J. W. (1988): Windbreak Technology. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 598 pp.
BRANDLE, J. R. – HODGES, L. – ZHOU, X. H. (2004): Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems. Agroforestry Systems 61: 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:agfo.0000028990.31801.62
BRANDLE, J. R. – JOHNSON, B. B. – AKESON, T. (1992): Field Windbreaks: Are They Economical? Journal of Production Agriculture 5 (3): 393–398. https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1992.0393
BRANDLE, J. R. – JOHNSON, B. B. – DEARMONT, D. D. (1984): Windbreak economics: The case of winter wheat production in eastern Nebraska. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 39: 339-343.
CARNOVALE, D. – BISSETT, A. – THRALL, P. H. – BAKER, G. (2019): Plant genus (Acacia and Eucalyptus) alters soil microbial community structure and relative abundance within revegetated shelterbelts. Applied Soil Ecology 133: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.09.001
CHEN, X. – PEI, T. – ZHOU, Z. – TENG, M. – HE, L. – LUO, M. – LIU, X. (2015): Efficiency differences of roadside greenbelts with three configurations in removing coarse particles (PM10): A street scale investigation in Wuhan, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 14: 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.02.013
CLÉMENT, H. – CANET, A. – ASFAUX, D. – BALAGUER, F. (2016): Without trees no bees: agroforestry for a productive and bee-smart agriculture. 3rd European Agroforestry Conference Montpellier, France, 23–25 May 2016 Book of Abstracts.
DANSZKY, I. (ed) (1972): Erdőművelés. [Forest management] Mezőgazdasági Kiadó Budapest. (in Hungarian)
DEN HERDER, M. – MORENO, G. – MOSQUERA-LOSADA, M. R. – PALMA, J. H. N. – SIDIROPOULOU, A. – SANTIAGO FREIJANES, J. – CROUS-DURAN, J. – PAULO, J. – TOMÉ, M. – PANTERA, A. – PAPANASTASIS, V. – MANTZANAS, K. – PACHANA, P. – BURGESS, P. J. (2015): Current extent and trends of agroforestry in the EU 27. Deliverable Report 1.2 for EU FP7 Research Project: AGFORWARD 613520. (4 December 2015). 99 p. Available online: http://agforward.eu/index.php/en/current-extent-and-trends-of-agroforestry-in-the-eu27.html
DEN HERDER, M. – MORENO, G. – MOSQUERA-LOSADA, R. M. – PALMA, J. H. N. – SIDIROPOULOU, A. – SANTIAGO FREIJANES, J.J. – CROUS-DURAN, J. – PAULO, J. A. – TOMÉ, M. – PANTERA, A. –
PAPANASTASIS, V.P. – MANTZANAS, K. – PACHANA, P. – PAPADOPOULOS, A. – PLIENINGER, T. – BURGESS, P. J. (2017): Current extent and stratification of agroforestry in the European Union. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 241: 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.005
DENG, R. – WANG, W. – FANG, H. – YAO, Z. (2015): Effect of farmland shelterbelts on gully erosion in the black soil region of Northeast China. J. For. Res. 26 (4): 941–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0110-4
DIX, M. E. (1976): Impact of hardwood borers on Great Plains shelterbelts. In: Forest Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington D. C.: Research on insect borers of hardwoods. Current status, needs, and application. Proceedings of a Research Coordination Meeting. Forest Insect and desease Research. Dealaware, Ohio, 30–31 March, 1976.
DÖMSÖDI, J. (2010): Tájrendezés és tájvédelem 4. Tájrendezési (tervezési) formák. [Landscape planning and protection] Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem. (in Hungarian)
DONKERSLEY, P. (2019): Trees for bees. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 270–271: 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.10.024
DUFLOT, R. – AVIRON, S. – ERNOULT, A. – FAHRIG, L. – BUREL, F. (2015): Reconsidering the role of ‘semi-natural habitat’ in agricultural landscape biodiversity: a case study. Ecol Res 30: 75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-014-1211-9
EASTERLING, W. E. – HAYS, C. J. – EASTERLING, M. K. – BRANDLE, J. R. (1997): Modelling the effect of shelterbelts on maize productivity under climate change: An application of the EPIC model. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 61: 163–176 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(96)01098-5
ECHAVARREN, J. M. – BALZEKIENE, A. – TELESIENE, A. (2019): Multilevel analysis of climate change risk perception in Europe: Natural hazards, political contexts and mediating individual effects. Safety Science 120: 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.024
EL AMAIN, K. B. – EL MADINA, A. M. (2014): Farmers Perceptions and Attitudes towards the Shelterbelts Establishmentin Farms, Gedarif State, Sudan. SUST Journal of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences (SJAVS) 15 (2) 26–34.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2013): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A new EU Forest Strategy: for forests and the forest-based sector. Retrieved on 26 June 2016. from: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/forest/strategy/communication_en.pdf
EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY, EEA (2007): Environmentally compatible bio-energy potential from European forests. Retrieved on 22 August 2012 from: http://www.efi.int/files/attachments/eea_bio_energy_10-01-2007_low.pdf
FERRANTI, F. (2014): Energy wood: A challenge for European forests Potentials, environmental implications, policy integration and related conflicts. EFI Technical Report 95.
FÖLDESI, R. – KOVÁCS-HOSTYÁNSZKI, A. – KŐRÖSI, Á. – SOMAY, L. – ELEK, Z. – MARKÓ, V. – SÁROSPATAKI, M. – BAKOS, R. – VARGA, Á. – NYISZTOR, K. – BÁLDI, A. (2016): Relationships between wild bees, hoverflies and pollination success in apple orchards with different landscape contexts. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 18: 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12135
FÓRIÁN, S. – HAGYMÁSSY, Z. (2009): Zöldfelületek szerepe az urbanizált környezetben. [The role of green areas in urban environment] Debreceni Műszaki Közlemények 2009/1–2 (in Hungarian)
FRANK, N – TAKÁCS, V. (2012): Hó- és szélfogó erdősávok minősítése szélsebesség-csökkentő hatásuk alapján [Qualification of windbreaks and shelterbelts based on their effects on windspeed] Erdészettudományi Közlemények 2 (1): 151–162.
GÁL, J. – KÁLDY, J. (1977): Erdősítés. [Afforestation] Akadémia Kiadó, Budapest. 3–640. (in Hungarian)
GÁL, J. – PÁNTOS, GY. – PÁNTOSNÉ, T. D. – SZABÓ, E. – VARGA, L. (1960): Adatok a fásítás termőhelymódosító hatásához az öntözőcsatornák mentén. [Data to the habitat-modifying effect of afforestation by irrigation canals] In: Erdészettudományi Közlemények 1960: 3–43. (in Hungarian)
GÁL, J. (1961): Az erdősávok hatása a szél sebességére. [The effect of shelterbelts on wind speed] In: Erdészettudományi Közlemények 1961: 3-69. (in Hungarian)
GÁL, J. (1963): A mezőgazdasági terméshozamok növekedése az erdősávok védelmében. [The increase of crop yield under the protection of shelterbelts] In: Erdészettudományi Közlemények 1963 (1–2): 41–83. (in Hungarian)
GÁL, J. (1972): A mezővédő fásítások tervezési és kivitelezési irányelvei. [The planning and implementation of field protection wood plantations] – Erdészeti tájrendezés és környezetvédelem, EFE Erdőmérnöki Kar, Sopron, 47–59. pp. (in Hungarian)
GARRETT, H. E. G. – BUCK, L. 1997: Agroforestry practice and policy in the United States of America. Forest Ecology and Management 1: 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03884-4
GENCSI, L – VANCSURA, R (1992): Dendrológia. [Dendrology] Mezőgazda Kiadó, Bp. (in Hungarian)
GONTIJO, L. M. (2019): Engineering natural enemy shelters to enhance conservation biological control in field crops. Biological Control 130: 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.10.014
GRALA, R.K. (2004): An evaluation of the benefits and costs of in-field shelterbelts in Midwestern USA. Dissertation. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa.
HASS, A. L. – LIESE, B. – HEONG, K. L. – SETTELE, J. – TSCHARNTKE, T. – WESTPHAL, C. (2018): Plantpollinator interactions and bee functional diversity are driven by agroforests in rice-dominated landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 253: 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.019
HEATH, B. A. – MAUGHAN, J. A. – MORRISON, A. A. – EASTWOOD, I. W. – DREW, I. B. – LOFKIN, M. (1999): The influence of wooded shelterbelts on the deposition of copper, lead and zinc at Shakerley Mere, Cheshire, England. The Science of the Total Environment 235: 415–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00250-8
HERCZOG, F. (2000): The importance of perennial trees for the balance of northern European agricultural landscapes. Unasylva 51:42–48
ISLAM, N. – RAHMAN, K.S. – BAHAR, M. – HABIB, A. – ANDO, K. – HATTORI, N. (2012): Pollution attenuation by roadside greenbelt in and around urban areas. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11:460– 464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.004
JÁNOSKA, F. (2011): Fészkelő madárállományok monitoringja erdősávokban. [The monitoring of nesting bird communities in shelterbelts] Ornis Hungarica 19: 125–132. (in Hungarian)
JØRGENSEN, S.E. (Ed.) (2009): Ecosystem ecology. Academic Press.
KARJALAINEN, T. – ASIKAINEN, A. – ILAVSKY, J. – ZAMBONI, R. – HOTARI, K.E. – RÖSER, D. (2004): Estimation of Energy Wood Potential in Europe. Natural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki
KHAVARIAN-GARMSIR, A. R. – POURAHMAD, A. – HATAMINEJAD, H. – FARHOODI, R. (2019): Climate change and environmental degradation and the drivers of migration in the context of shrinking cities: A case study of Khuzestan province, Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society 47: 101480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101480
KÖLÜS, G. (1979): Nagyforgalmú közutak melletti útvédő erdősávok környezetvédelmi jelentősége. [The environmental impact of shelterbelts by the side of high traffic roads] Erdészeti Lapok 114 (7): 295:302 (in Hungarian)
KORT, J. (1988): Benefits of windbreaks to field and forage crop. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22–23: 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(88)90017-5
KOWALCHUK, T. E. – de JONG, E. (1995): Shelterbelts and their effect on crop yield. Can. J. Soil Sci. 75: 543–550
KULSHRESHTHA, S. N. – AHMAD, R. – BELCHER, K. – RUDD, L. (2018): Economic–environmental impacts of shelterbelts in Saskatchewan, Canada. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 215: 277–286. https://doi.org/10.2495/EID180251
LAZAREV, M. M. (2006): Transformation of the Annual Water Budget of Soils under Shelterbelts. Eurasian Soil Science, 39 (12): 1318–1322. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229306120064
LI, X – LIU, L. – XIE, J. – WANG, Z. – YANG, S. – ZHANG, Z. – QI, S. – LI, Y. (2020): Optimizing the quantity and spatial patterns of farmland shelter forests increases cotton productivity in arid lands. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 292: 106832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.106832
LI, X. – LIU, Y. – DUAN, M. – YU, Z. – AXMACHER, JC. (2018): Different response patterns of epigaeic spiders and carabid beetles to varyingenvironmental conditions infields and semi-natural habitats of anintensively cultivated agricultural landscape. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 264: 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.005
LORENZ, K. – LAL, R. (2014): Soil organic carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA, 34 (2): 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0212-y
LUETZENBURG, G. – BITTNER, M. J. – CALSAMIGLIA, A. – RENSCHLER, C. S. – ESTRANY, J. – POEPPL, R. (2019): Climate and land use change effects on soil erosion in two small agricultural catchment systems Fugnitz – Austria, Can Revull - Spain, Science of the Total Environment 704: 135389 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135389
MÁTYÁS, CS. (ED) (2005): Erdészeti ökológia. [Forestry Ecology] Mezőgazda Kiadó, Bp. (in Hungarian)
MERTIA, R. S. – PRASAD, R. – GAJJA, B. L. – SAMRA, J. S. – NARAIN, P. (2006): Impact of shelterbelts in arid region of Western Rajastan. Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Jaisalmer. Evergreen Printers, Jodhpur, 2006.
MIZE, C. W. – BRANDLE, J. R. – SCHOENEBERGER, M. M. – BENTRUP, G. (2008): Ecological Development and Function of Shelterbelts in Temperate North America. In: Jose S, Gordon M (ed): Toward Agroforestry Design. Advances in Agroforestry 4: 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6572-9_3
MORRISON, J. – IZQUIERDO, J. – PLAZA, E. H. – GONZÁLEZ-ANDÚJAR, J. L. (2017): The role of field margins in supporting wild bees in Mediterranean cereal agroecosystems: Which biotic and abiotic factors are important? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 247: 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.047
NAIR, P. K. R. – NAIR, D. V. – KUMAR, B. M. – SHOWALTER, J. M. (2010): Carbon Sequestration in Agroforestry Systems. Advances in Agronomy 108: 237–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2113(10)08005-3
NÉGYESI, G. (2018): Mezővédő fásítások tér- és időbeli változásának vizsgálata a Nyírségben – a szélerózió szemszögéből. [The changes in space and time of field protecting wood plantations in Nyírség – from the point of view of wind erosion] Tájökológiai Lapok 16 (2): 113–128. (in Hungarian)
NÉMETH, Cs. (2014): Kisemlős közösségek vizsgálata a Lajta project erdősávrendszerében. [investigation on small mammal communities in the Lajta project forest belt system] Magyar Apróvad Közlemények 12: 275:356 (in Hungarian)
NUBERG, I. K. (1998): Effects of shelter on temperate crops: a review to refine research for Australian conditions. Agroforestry Systems 41: 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006071821948
ODANAKA, K. A. – REHAN, S. M. (2019): Impact indicators: Effects of land use management on functional trait and phylogenetic diversity of wild bees. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 286: 106663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106663
PALOTÁS, L. (1985): Mérnöki Kézikönyv III. [Engineering Manual] Műszaki Könyvkiadó Bp. (in Hungarian)
PISANELLI, A. – PERALI, A. – PARIS, P. (2012): Potentialities and uncertainties of novel agroforestry systems in the European C.A.P.: farmers’ and professionals’ perspectives in Italy. L’Italia Forestale e Montana / Italian Journal of Forest and Mountain Environments 67 (3): 289–297, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4129/ifm.2012.3.07
PISANELLI, A. – SMITH, J – WESTAWAY, S. – GHALEY, B. B. – MØLGAARD, L. L. – BOREK, R., – ZAJĄCZKOWSKI, J. – MIGNON, S. – GLIGA, A. E. – FERERES, E. – LÓPEZ, M. – TENREIRO, T. R. – RÖHRIG, N. – VON OPPENKOWSKI, M. – ROESLER, T. – HASSLER, M. (2019): Technical guidelines for farmers and other stakeholders, factsheets on case studies and preparation of policy briefs. WP5. Dissemination of outputs and communication to stakeholders Report. SUSTAINFARM project. pp. 32–37
REMPEL, J. C. – KULSHRESHTHA, S. N. – AMICHEV, B. Y. – VAN REES, K. C. J. (2017): Costs and benefits of shelterbelts: A review of producers’ perceptions and mind map analyses for Saskatchewan, Canada. Can. J. Soil Sci. 97: 341–352 https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2016-0100
RIGUEIRO-RODRÍGUEZ, A. – MCADAM, J. – MOSQUERA-LOSADA M. R. (Eds.) (2009): Agroforestry in Europe: Current Status and Future Prospects. Advances in Agroforesry 6: 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8272-6
ROIS-DÍAZ, M. – LOVRIC, N. – LOVRIC, M. – FERREIRO-DOMÍNGUEZ, N. – MOSQUERA-LOSADA, M. R. – M. DEN HERDER, M. – GRAVES, A. – PALMA, J. H. N. – PAULO, J. A. – PISANELLI, A. – SMITH, J. – MORENO, G. – GARCÍA, S. – VARGA, A. – PANTERA, A. – MIRCK, J. – BURGESS, P. (2018): Farmers’ reasoning behind the uptake of agroforestry practices: evidence from multiple casestudies across Europe. Agroforest Syst 92: 811–828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0139-9
SAHA, S. K. – NAIR, P. K. R. – NAIR, V. D. – KUMAR, B. M. (2009): Soil carbon stock in relation to plant diversity of homegardens in Kerala, India. Agrofor Syst 76: 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9228-8
SANTIAGO-FREIJANES, J. J. – MOSQUERA-LOSADA M. R. – PISANELLI, A. –LAMERSDORF, N. – BURGUESS, P. – FERNÁNDEZ-LORENZO, J. L. – GONZÁLEZ-HERNÁNDEZ, P. – FERREIRODOMÍNGUEZ, N. – RIGUEIRO-RODRÍGUEZ, A. (2016): Agroforestry in the rural development CAP: Pillar II. 3rd European Agroforestry Conference Montpellier, France, 23–25 May 2016 Book of Abstracts.
SCHALLER, L. – TARGETTI, S. – VILLANUEA, A. J. –ZASADA, I. – KANTELHARDT, J. – ARRIAZA, M. – BAL, T. – FEDRIGOTTI, V. B. – GIRAYI, F. H. – HÄFNER, K. – MAJEWSKI, E. – MALAKRAWLIKOWSKA, A. – NIKOLOV, D. – PAOLI, J. C. – PIORRE, A. – RODRÍGUEZ-ENTRENA M. – UNGARO, F. – VERBURG, P. H. – VAN ZANTEN, B. – VIAGGI, D. (2018): Agricultural landscapes, ecosystem services and regional competitiveness — Assessing drivers and mechanisms in nine European case study areas. Land Use Policy 76: 735–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.001
STANCHEVA, J. – BENCHEVA, S. – PETKOVA, K. – PIRALKOV, V. (2006): Possibilities for agroforestry development in Bulgaria: Outlooks and limitations. ecological engineering 29: 382–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.09.013
SZARVAS, P. (2010): Mezővédő erdősávok, fasorok jellemzése, ökológiai feltárása, kihatásai. [Characterization, ecological exploration and effects of field protection forest strips and tree lines] Doctoral thesis. Debreceni Egyetem. (in Hungarian)
SZÉL, Gy. – KÁDÁR, F. (2012): Futóbogár- együttesek vizsgálata a Lajta project területén. (Investigations of ground beetle assemblages in the Lajta Project (Mosonszolnok, W-Hungary.) – In: Faragó S. (szerk.): A Lajta Project: Egy tartamos mezei vad és ökoszisztéma vizsgálat 20 éve. [The Lajta Project: 20 years of a long-term field wildlife and ecosystem study] Nyugatmagyarországi Egyetem Kiadó, Sopron. pp.: 244–269. (in Hungarian)
TAKÁCS, V. – FRANK, N. (2008): The traditions, resources and potential of forest growing and multipurpose shelterbelts in Hungary. In: Antonio Rigueiro-Rodróguez, Jim McAdam, Maria Rosa Mosquera-Losada (szerk.) Agroforestry in Europe: Current status and future prospects. 449 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8272-6_21
TAKÁCS, V. (2008): Útfásítások közlekedésbiztonsági vizsgálata a Sopron-Fertőd Kistérség területén. [Analysis of traffic safety of roadside afforestations in the Sopron-Fertőd region] Doctoral thesis, NyME, Sopron. (in Hungarian)
TODD, J. H. – POULTON, J. – RICHARDS, K. – MALONE, L. A. (2018): Effect of orchard management, neighbouring land-use and shelterbelt tree composition on the parasitism of pest leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) larvae in kiwifruit orchard shelterbelts. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 260: 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.03.016
TORITA, H. – SATOU, H. (2007). Relationship between shelterbelt structure and mean wind reduction. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 145 (3–4): 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.04.018
TYNDALL J. C. (2009): Characterizing pork producer demand for shelterbelts to mitigate odor: An Iowa case study. Agroforest Syst 77: 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9242-x URL1: (http://www.agforinsight.com/?p=214) BEE URL2: http://www.agforinsight.com/?p=371
VANDERMEER, J. (1989): The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge University Press, UK. VERNON, C. Q. – GARDNER, J. – BRANDLE, J. R. – BOES, T. K. (1991): Windbreaks in Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Papers in Natural Resources. 127. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers/127
WILLIS, W. B. – EICHINGER, W. E. – PRUEGER, J. H. – HAPEMAN, C. J. – LI, H. – BUSER, M. D. – HATFIELD, J. L. – WANJURA, J. D. – Gregory A. – HOLT, G. A. – TORRENTS, A. – PLENNER, S. J. – CLARIDA, W. – BROWNE, S. D. – DOWNEY, P. M. – YAO, Q. (2017): Particulate capture efficiency of a vegetative environmental buffer surrounding an animal feeding operation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 240: 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.006
WINKLER, D. (2012): A Lajta projekt herpetofaunája. [The herpetofauna of the Lajta project] In: Faragó S. (ed.): A Lajta Project: Egy tartamos mezei vad és ökoszisztéma vizsgálat 20 éve. [The Lajta Project: 20 years of a long-term field wildlife and ecosystem study] Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem Kiadó, Sopron. pp.: 280–283. (in Hungarian)
WINKLER, D. – TRASER, GY. (2012): Collembola Diversity in Agricultural Environments (Lajta Project, Western Hungary). International Scientific Conference on Sustainable Development & Ecological Footprint Sopron, Hungary March 26–27 2012.
WINKLER, D. – TRASER, GY. (2017): Talajlakó mezofauna (collembola) vizsgálatok a Lajta project területén. Hungarian Small Game Bulletin 13: 213–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.17243/mavk.2017.213
WIRÉHN, L. (2018): Nordic agriculture under climate change: A systematic review of challenges, opportunities and adaptation strategies for crop production. Land Use Policy 77: 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.059
WU, P. – AXMACHER, J. C. – LI, X. – SONG, X. – YU, Z. – XU, H. – TSCARNTKE, T. – WESTPHAL, C. – LIU, Y. (2019): Contrasting effects of natural shrubland and plantation forests on bee assemblages at neighboring apple orchards in Beijing, China. Biological Conservation 237: 456–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.029
XIE, H. – WANG, G. – YU, M. (2018): Ecosystem multifunctionality is highly related to the shelterbelt structure and plant species diversity in mixed shelterbelts of eastern China. Global Ecology and Conservation 16: e00470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00470
YANG, D. – LIU, W. – WANG, J. – LIU, B. – FANG, Y. – LI, H. – ZOU, X. (2018): Wind erosion forces and wind direction distribution for assessing the efficiency of shelterbelts in northern China. Aeolian Research 33: 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2018.05.001
ZAJĄCZKOWSKI, J. (2016): Ecosystem services by trees outside forest: should the structure and location of new plantings matter more? 3rd European Agroforestry Conference Montpellier, France, 23–25 May 2016 Book of Abstracts.
ZHENG, X. – ZHU, J. – XING, Z. 2016: Assessment of the effects of shelterbelts on crop yields at the regional scale in Northeast China. Agricultural Systems 143: 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.12.008
ZHOU, X. H. – BRANDLE, J. R. C. – MIZE, C. W. – TAKLE, E. S. (2004): Three-dimensional aerodynamic structure of a tree shelterbelt: Definition, characterization and working models. Agroforestry Systems 63: 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-004-3147-5
ZHU, J.-J. (2008): Wind Shelterbelts. Encyclopedia of Ecology, 3803–3812. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-008045405-4.00366-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Silvatica & Lignaria Hungarica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ACTA SILVATICA & LIGNARIA HUNGARICA 